Live from the library

RESEARCH_FEED_

Measured impact across 60 prompts, 9 techniques, 16 industries. Auto-updated nightly. We publish honest numbers — including the techniques that don't work.

60
Total prompts
83%
Avg effectiveness
40
Featured
16
Industries
53
Categories

TECHNIQUE_ROI_

bar = adoption % · number = effectiveness (0–1)

  • decision-treesn=6 · 10.0%
    0.87
  • self-verificationn=21 · 35.0%
    0.85
  • multi-perspectiven=17 · 28.3%
    0.85
  • chain-of-thoughtn=34 · 56.7%
    0.84
  • adaptiven=6 · 10.0%
    0.84
  • structured-outputn=50 · 83.3%
    0.83
  • step-by-stepn=24 · 40.0%
    0.83
  • few-shotn=20 · 33.3%
    0.82
  • role-playingn=20 · 33.3%
    0.81

EFFECTIVENESS_DISTRIBUTION_

count of prompts per score bucket

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
51
3
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9

Distribution of effectiveness scores across all library prompts.

INDUSTRY_LEADERBOARD_

ranked by prompt count · ring shows avg effectiveness

COMPLEXITY_MIX_

  • basic610%
  • intermediate2237%
  • advanced2033%
  • expert1220%

TIER_MIX_

  • free2745%
  • pro3253%
  • enterprise12%

This feed is generated from real prompt metadata. Every technique count, every effectiveness score is observable in the DB. We'll add per-prompt eval-run analytics once the Evolution Loop has a month of data.

generated 2026-06-02T10:22:33.052Z · cached 5 min